FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Jochem Ritmeester van de

Kamp

AMNetherlands · SC Telstar

№ 865281Emerging €1.2M +0.25

Player dossierEredivisie

Jochem Ritmeester van deKamp

AMAttacking MidfieldMidfield

Club
SC Telstar
League
Eredivisie
Nationality
Netherlands
Age
22
Height
177 cm
Foot
Right
Valued
28 May 2026

Reading the valuation

The market values Kamp at €1.5M. Model A, which never saw Kamp during training, estimates €1.2M: the market value is 29% above that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.29. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is within its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €4.1M, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▲ +0.25A €1.2M▼ −1.01B €4.1M
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
60
Minutes
4,447
Goals
7
Assists
4
Started
50/60
Min / app
74
Cards
9Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Kamp…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €1.5M

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €1.5MModel A €1.2M

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 1,687 midfielders

Jochem Ritmeester van de Kamp's percentiles among midfielders: Goals per 90 69th, Assists per 90 44th, Minutes, two years 80th, Starts 76th, Minutes, last 365 days 76th, European club minutes 30th69thGoals44thAssists80thMinutes76thStarts76thRecent30thEurope

Dashed ring: the midfielder median (50th percentile)

Minutes, two years

Total club minutes in the two-year window: how much the player was used.

4,447 this player2,607 midfielder median80th percentile

451peer deciles · median line · this player ●9,624

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€25k
Mar 2022
Peak
€1.5M
May 2026
Model target
€1.5M
May 2026
Valuations
12
2 club changes
May 2026€1.5MSC TelstarValuation the model is trained to reproduce

May 2026: €1.5M, SC Telstar. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2022-03-24€25kAlmere City FC U21
2022-06-23€25kAlmere City FC U21
2023-04-03€300kAlmere City FC
2023-07-04€400kAlmere City FC
2023-12-15€700kAlmere City FC
2024-03-18€900kAlmere City FC
2024-05-31€900kAlmere City FC
2024-12-17€800kAlmere City FC
2025-05-28€800kAlmere City FC
2025-12-02€950kSC Telstar
2026-03-11€1.3MSC Telstar
2026-05-28€1.5MSC Telstar

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
+0.254

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Eredivisie425 players · median €1M

Valued above 54% of the 425 Eredivisie players.

€75k€500k€3M€20M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Midfielders, all leagues1,687 players · median €2M

Valued above 39% of the 1,687 midfielders.

€20k€200k€2M€20M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Where Kamp appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).