FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Portrait of Dane Scarlett

Dane

Scarlett

CFEngland · Hibernian FC

№ 670883Emerging €862k +0.55

Image: FootyLogos

Player dossierPremiership

DaneScarlett

CFCentre-ForwardAttack

Club
Hibernian FC
League
Premiership
Nationality
England
Age
22
Height
180 cm
Foot
Right
Valued
20 May 2026

Reading the valuation

The market values Scarlett at €1.5M. Model A, which never saw Scarlett during training, estimates €862k: the market value is 74% above that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.74. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is larger than its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €1.1M, closer to the market here, although it is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07).

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▲ +0.55A €862k▲ +0.27B €1.1M
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
22
Minutes
727
Goals
1
Assists
4
Started
8/22
Min / app
33
Cards
3Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Scarlett…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €1.5M

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €1.5MModel A €862k

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 1,583 attackers

Dane Scarlett's percentiles among attackers: Goals per 90 18th, Assists per 90 99th, Minutes, two years 10th, Starts 16th, Minutes, last 365 days 14th, European club minutes 65th18thGoals99thAssists10thMinutes16thStarts14thRecent65thEurope

Dashed ring: the attacker median (50th percentile)

Assists per 90

Club assists per 90 minutes in the same window.

0.50 this player0.15 attacker median99th percentile

0.00peer deciles · median line · this player ●0.73

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€250k
Dec 2020
Peak
€2M
Jul 2022
Model target
€1.5M
May 2026
Valuations
10
5 club changes
May 2026€1.5MHibernian FCValuation the model is trained to reproduce

May 2026: €1.5M, Hibernian FC. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2020-12-17€250kTottenham Hotspur U18
2022-07-29€2MPortsmouth FC
2023-04-05€1.8MPortsmouth FC
2023-10-27€1.8MIpswich Town
2023-12-21€1.8MIpswich Town
2024-09-24€1.5MOxford United
2024-12-30€1.8MOxford United
2025-05-30€2MTottenham Hotspur
2025-12-09€2MTottenham Hotspur
2026-05-20€1.5MHibernian FC

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
+0.554

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Premiership311 players · median €400k

Valued above 78% of the 311 Premiership players.

€20k€150k€1M€7.5M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Attackers, all leagues1,583 players · median €2.5M

Valued above 37% of the 1,583 attackers.

€20k€300k€5M€75M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Where Scarlett appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).