FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Nathan

Wood

CBEngland · Southampton FC

№ 503990Established €2.8M +0.37

Player dossierPremier League

NathanWood

CBCentre-BackDefender

Club
Southampton FC
League
Premier League
Nationality
England
Age
23
Height
188 cm
Foot
Right
Valued
3 Dec 2025

Reading the valuation

The market values Wood at €4M. Model A, which never saw Wood during training, estimates €2.8M: the market value is 44% above that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.44. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is within its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €798k, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▲ +0.37A €2.8M▲ +1.61B €798k
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
13
Minutes
879
Goals
0
Assists
0
Started
10/13
Min / app
68
Cards
3Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Wood…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €4M

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €4MModel A €2.8M

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 2,065 defenders

Nathan Wood's percentiles among defenders: Goals per 90 18th, Assists per 90 17th, Minutes, two years 9th, Starts 38th, Minutes, last 365 days 22nd, European club minutes 30th18thGoals17thAssists9thMinutes38thStarts22ndRecent30thEurope

Dashed ring: the defender median (50th percentile)

Starts

Share of appearances started rather than entered from the bench.

77% this player83% defender median38th percentile

18%peer deciles · median line · this player ●100%

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€250k
Sept 2020
Peak
€5M
Jun 2023
Model target
€4M
Dec 2025
Valuations
13
2 club changes
Dec 2025€4MSouthampton FCValuation the model is trained to reproduce

Dec 2025: €4M, Southampton FC. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2020-09-11€250kMiddlesbrough FC
2020-10-15€300kMiddlesbrough FC
2021-06-30€300kMiddlesbrough FC
2022-05-13€300kMiddlesbrough FC
2022-09-14€900kSwansea City
2022-10-27€1.2MSwansea City
2023-06-01€5MSwansea City
2023-12-21€4MSwansea City
2024-05-24€3.8MSwansea City
2024-12-16€3.8MSouthampton FC
2025-05-30€3.5MSouthampton FC
2025-10-06€4MSouthampton FC
2025-12-03€4MSouthampton FC

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
+0.365

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Premier League555 players · median €18M

Valued above 16% of the 555 Premier League players.

€150k€1M€7.5M€50M€4MSee them in the Explorer →

Defenders, all leagues2,065 players · median €2M

Valued above 65% of the 2,065 defenders.

€20k€200k€2M€20M€4MSee them in the Explorer →

Where Wood appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).