FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Niklas

Vesterlund

RBDenmark · FC Utrecht

№ 422932Emerging €2.6M −0.56

Player dossierEredivisie

NiklasVesterlund

RBRight-BackDefender

Club
FC Utrecht
League
Eredivisie
Nationality
Denmark
Age
26
Height
185 cm
Foot
Right
Valued
28 May 2026

Reading the valuation

The market values Vesterlund at €1.5M. Model A, which never saw Vesterlund during training, estimates €2.6M: the market value is 43% below that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.75. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is larger than its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €2.8M, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▼ −0.56A €2.6M▼ −0.64B €2.8M
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
36
Minutes
2,383
Goals
2
Assists
4
Started
28/36
Min / app
66
Cards
4Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Vesterlund…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €1.5M

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €1.5MModel A €2.6M

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 2,065 defenders

Niklas Vesterlund's percentiles among defenders: Goals per 90 78th, Assists per 90 89th, Minutes, two years 41st, Starts 40th, Minutes, last 365 days 50th, European club minutes 77th78thGoals89thAssists41stMinutes40thStarts50thRecent77thEurope

Dashed ring: the defender median (50th percentile)

Assists per 90

Club assists per 90 minutes in the same window.

0.15 this player0.04 defender median89th percentile

0.00peer deciles · median line · this player ●0.58

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€50k
Sept 2017
Peak
€1.5M
May 2026
Model target
€1.5M
May 2026
Valuations
13
3 club changes
May 2026€1.5MFC UtrechtValuation the model is trained to reproduce

May 2026: €1.5M, FC Utrecht. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2017-09-06€50kFC Copenhagen U19
2018-12-21€50kFC Copenhagen U19
2020-10-25€100kTrelleborgs FF
2022-01-03€300kTromsø IL
2022-12-09€400kTromsø IL
2023-06-29€600kTromsø IL
2023-09-07€800kTromsø IL
2023-12-15€1.2MTromsø IL
2024-05-31€1.2MFC Utrecht
2024-12-17€1MFC Utrecht
2025-05-28€1MFC Utrecht
2025-12-02€800kFC Utrecht
2026-05-28€1.5MFC Utrecht

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
−0.558

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Eredivisie425 players · median €1M

Valued above 54% of the 425 Eredivisie players.

€75k€500k€3M€20M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Defenders, all leagues2,065 players · median €2M

Valued above 43% of the 2,065 defenders.

€20k€200k€2M€20M€1.5MSee them in the Explorer →

Where Vesterlund appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).