FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Nigel

Thomas

LWCuracao · ADO Den Haag

№ 412952Emerging €507k −0.52

Player dossierEredivisie

NigelThomas

LWLeft WingerAttack

Club
ADO Den Haag
League
Eredivisie
Nationality
Curacao
Age
24
Height
177 cm
Foot
Right
Valued
16 Dec 2025

Reading the valuation

The market values Thomas at €300k. Model A, which never saw Thomas during training, estimates €507k: the market value is 41% below that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.69. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is larger than its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €633k, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▼ −0.52A €507k▼ −0.75B €633k
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
13
Minutes
715
Goals
1
Assists
1
Started
10/13
Min / app
55
Cards
4Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Thomas…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €300k

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €300kModel A €507k

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 1,583 attackers

Nigel Thomas's percentiles among attackers: Goals per 90 18th, Assists per 90 42nd, Minutes, two years 9th, Starts 79th, Minutes, last 365 days 2nd, European club minutes 28th18thGoals42ndAssists9thMinutes79thStarts2ndRecent28thEurope

Dashed ring: the attacker median (50th percentile)

Starts

Share of appearances started rather than entered from the bench.

77% this player59% attacker median79th percentile

5%peer deciles · median line · this player ●100%

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€25k
Aug 2020
Peak
€700k
Mar 2023
Model target
€300k
Dec 2025
Valuations
14
5 club changes
Dec 2025€300kADO Den HaagValuation the model is trained to reproduce

Dec 2025: €300k, ADO Den Haag. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2020-08-12€25kPSV Eindhoven U21
2020-10-15€100kPSV Eindhoven U21
2020-12-31€150kPSV Eindhoven U21
2021-03-16€250kPSV Eindhoven U21
2022-01-12€300kPSV Eindhoven U21
2022-06-23€300kPSV Eindhoven U21
2022-11-01€500kFC Paços de Ferreira
2023-03-02€700kFC Paços de Ferreira
2023-06-16€700kFC Paços de Ferreira
2023-12-21€700kViborg FF
2024-06-10€700kViborg FF
2024-12-19€600kCD Nacional
2025-06-23€300kAcadémico Viseu FC
2025-12-16€300kADO Den Haag

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
non-UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
−0.525

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Eredivisie425 players · median €1M

Valued above 8% of the 425 Eredivisie players.

€75k€500k€3M€20M€300kSee them in the Explorer →

Attackers, all leagues1,583 players · median €2.5M

Valued above 8% of the 1,583 attackers.

€20k€300k€5M€75M€300kSee them in the Explorer →

Where Thomas appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).