FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Maxim

Dekker

CBNetherlands · AZ Alkmaar

№ 646704Emerging €1.3M −0.67

Player dossierEredivisie

MaximDekker

CBCentre-BackDefender

Club
AZ Alkmaar
League
Eredivisie
Nationality
Netherlands
Age
22
Height
192 cm
Foot
Left
Valued
28 May 2026

Reading the valuation

The market values Dekker at €650k. Model A, which never saw Dekker during training, estimates €1.3M: the market value is 49% below that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.96. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is larger than its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €3M, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▼ −0.67A €1.3M▼ −1.55B €3M
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
24
Minutes
1,323
Goals
0
Assists
0
Started
15/24
Min / app
55
Cards
2Y 1R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Dekker…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €650k

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €650kModel A €1.3M

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 2,065 defenders

Maxim Dekker's percentiles among defenders: Goals per 90 18th, Assists per 90 17th, Minutes, two years 19th, Starts 18th, Minutes, last 365 days 9th, European club minutes 91st18thGoals17thAssists19thMinutes18thStarts9thRecent91stEurope

Dashed ring: the defender median (50th percentile)

European club minutes

Share of minutes played in UEFA club competitions.

26% this player0% defender median91st percentile

0%peer deciles · median line · this player ●85%

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€25k
Oct 2021
Peak
€1.5M
Nov 2022
Model target
€650k
May 2026
Valuations
12
1 club change
May 2026€650kAZ AlkmaarValuation the model is trained to reproduce

May 2026: €650k, AZ Alkmaar. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2021-10-12€25kAZ Alkmaar U21
2022-01-12€100kAZ Alkmaar U21
2022-06-23€400kAZ Alkmaar U21
2022-09-14€700kAZ Alkmaar
2022-11-11€1.5MAZ Alkmaar
2023-06-23€1.5MAZ Alkmaar
2023-12-15€1MAZ Alkmaar
2024-05-31€800kAZ Alkmaar
2024-12-17€1MAZ Alkmaar
2025-05-28€1MAZ Alkmaar
2025-12-02€800kAZ Alkmaar
2026-05-28€650kAZ Alkmaar

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
−0.674

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Eredivisie425 players · median €1M

Valued above 32% of the 425 Eredivisie players.

€75k€500k€3M€20M€650kSee them in the Explorer →

Defenders, all leagues2,065 players · median €2M

Valued above 25% of the 2,065 defenders.

€20k€200k€2M€20M€650kSee them in the Explorer →

Where Dekker appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).