FairValue

Checking model

Esc

  • EnvironmentOverviewWhat FairValue measures, what it found, where to go next.
  • EnvironmentTerminalExplore, compare and track players; market, league and model views.
  • EnvironmentStoriesValuations, head-to-heads and research findings, told as stories.
  • TerminalPlayer ExplorerSearch, filter and sort the player export.
  • TerminalComparison StudioTwo to four players on one scale.
  • TerminalWatchlistsNamed collections, kept in this browser.
  • TerminalMarket LandscapeHow observed value is distributed, and where the model drifts.

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to closeLoading player index…

Théo

Bongonda

RWDR Congo · Spartak Moscow

№ 280701Established €1.8M +0.49

Player dossierPremier Liga

ThéoBongonda

RWRight WingerAttack

Club
Spartak Moscow
League
Premier Liga
Nationality
DR Congo
Age
30
Height
176 cm
Foot
Left
Valued
26 May 2026

Reading the valuation

The market values Bongonda at €3M. Model A, which never saw Bongonda during training, estimates €1.8M: the market value is 63% above that estimate.

That is a factor of ×1.63. Model A's typical held-out miss is ×1.50 either way, so this gap is larger than its usual error.

Without league and club, Model B estimates €829k, further from the market. Model B is usually further off (typical miss ×2.07): league and club explain much of how the market prices players.

A gap describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what the player is worth.

▲ +0.49A €1.8M▲ +1.29B €829k
Pitch length is a log value scale fitted to this player's figures. ● observed · ◇ Model A · dashed ◇ Model B · each arc is a residual, log(observed) − log(estimate).
Apps
39
Minutes
2,261
Goals
8
Assists
4
Started
30/39
Min / app
58
Cards
1Y 0R

Club matches, two years to the valuation date

The Valuation Journey

What moves Model A

Asking the prediction API to explain Model A for Bongonda…

SHAP describes the model's arithmetic for this player's inputs, not what causes market value. Model B can be explained only by the live service; Model A also has a published explanation for the research players.

Model A vs Model B against the observed €3M

Checking API
EmergingEstablishedEliteWorld Class€2M€10M€30M€100k€1M€100MMarket €3MModel A €1.8M

Asking the prediction API…

Held-out estimates come from cross-validation, with this player outside the training data: the honest comparison. Served models were refitted on every player, this one included, so they sit closer to the market. Shaded band: Model A's typical miss (×1.50 either way).

Player traitspercentiles vs 1,583 attackers

Théo Bongonda's percentiles among attackers: Goals per 90 60th, Assists per 90 55th, Minutes, two years 50th, Starts 79th, Minutes, last 365 days 3rd, European club minutes 28th60thGoals55thAssists50thMinutes79thStarts3rdRecent28thEurope

Dashed ring: the attacker median (50th percentile)

Starts

Share of appearances started rather than entered from the bench.

77% this player59% attacker median79th percentile

5%peer deciles · median line · this player ●100%

No passing, progression or defensive actions exist in the dataset, so no trait claims to measure them.

Valuation history every Transfermarkt valuation on record

First valuation
€50k
Aug 2013
Peak
€11M
Jun 2021
Model target
€3M
May 2026
Valuations
34
5 club changes
May 2026€3MSpartak MoscowValuation the model is trained to reproduce

May 2026: €3M, Spartak Moscow. Dotted lines mark the €2M, €10M and €30M tier boundaries.

Show as a table
DateMarket valueClub
2013-08-12€50kZulte Waregem
2014-02-10€300kZulte Waregem
2014-06-28€1.5MZulte Waregem
2015-01-23€1.5MCelta de Vigo
2015-07-01€1.5MCelta de Vigo
2016-02-22€2.5MCelta de Vigo
2016-07-15€2.5MCelta de Vigo
2017-01-24€3MCelta de Vigo
2017-06-05€3MCelta de Vigo
2018-02-12€2MZulte Waregem
2018-03-30€2.2MZulte Waregem
2018-06-03€2.8MZulte Waregem
2018-12-27€2.5MZulte Waregem
2019-03-04€3MZulte Waregem
2019-06-10€6MZulte Waregem
2019-12-13€5.5MKRC Genk
2020-04-08€4.5MKRC Genk
2020-10-16€4MKRC Genk
2021-01-04€9MKRC Genk
2021-06-07€11MKRC Genk
2022-01-06€9MKRC Genk
2022-04-12€7.5MKRC Genk
2022-05-26€7MKRC Genk
2022-09-23€6MCádiz CF
2022-11-07€4MCádiz CF
2023-06-13€4MCádiz CF
2023-10-05€5MSpartak Moscow
2023-12-11€5MSpartak Moscow
2024-06-04€5MSpartak Moscow
2024-12-12€6MSpartak Moscow
2025-06-04€6MSpartak Moscow
2025-12-16€5MSpartak Moscow
2026-03-25€4MSpartak Moscow
2026-05-26€3MSpartak Moscow

Audit context group-level, not about this player

Audit group
non-UEFA
Population gap, Model A
+0.093 95% CI +0.063 to +0.124
This player, market vs held-out A
+0.487

The group comes from first-listed citizenship and is never a model input. Across the population, non-UEFA players' market values sit about 10% above Model A's held-out estimates, relative to UEFA players in the same leagues. One player's residual says nothing about that pattern (typical miss ×1.50), and none of it is evidence of discrimination: the target may itself be biased. Open the Fairness Audit

In context observed value among comparable players in this build

All players in the Terminal →

Premier Liga412 players · median €1M

Valued above 77% of the 412 Premier Liga players.

€50k€300k€2M€15M€3MSee them in the Explorer →

Attackers, all leagues1,583 players · median €2.5M

Valued above 52% of the 1,583 attackers.

€20k€300k€5M€75M€3MSee them in the Explorer →

Where Bongonda appears

Watchlists and the comparison tray are kept in this browser only.

Near this valuation closest observed values: same league, then same position

Counts and ranks of observed Transfermarkt values only; model errors are never ranked here. Full player export: Every player in the modelling population (D-011).